 March 07, 2008, 10:50 AM | #0 |
2broke2gofast
Trade Count:
( 0)
revving engine
 Offline
Posts: 153
|
Can you all shoot me some of your Launch RPMs and 60' times? thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| March 07, 2008, 11:11 AM | #1 |
Paul
Undersecretary for GoFuckYourself
Global Moderator
Trade Count:
( +24)
SN95 Veteran
Offline
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 7,891
Shadetree Mechanic
|
It would be virtually irrelevant for you to gather that data unless it was a very similar car, with similar mods, in similar conditions, with similar air, on similar tires, etc...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| March 07, 2008, 11:25 AM | #2 |
justinschmidt1
Trade Count:
( +13)
SN95 Veteran
Offline
Posts: 5,981
|
launch at 6500!
I cut 1.3 60 foots in my stock 96 gt by launching that high!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| March 07, 2008, 04:43 PM | #3 |
brightwhite98GT
Trade Count:
( 0)
redlining 1st
Offline
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 240
|
I just got back from the races not too long ago. It was my first time ever racing, so I have no idea if I did good or bad. But my 60' time best was a 2.17 (with street tires 245 width) and my best 1/8 mile time was 9.31. Is that good or bad?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
98 Mustang GT *RIP*
94 Mustang GT - MAC H pipe, Pro 5.0 short shifter, BBK CAI, 3.73 gears, underdrive pulleys, MSD cap, MSD ignition, EGR deleted, AC deleted, BBK shortie headers
-Devin
|
|
|
| March 07, 2008, 06:08 PM | #4 |
justinschmidt1
Trade Count:
( +13)
SN95 Veteran
Offline
Posts: 5,981
|
I just got back from the races not too long ago. It was my first time ever racing, so I have no idea if I did good or bad. But my 60' time best was a 2.17 (with street tires 245 width) and my best 1/8 mile time was 9.31. Is that good or bad?
not bad for the first time out...but the 60 could definately improve...is this a 5 speed or auto? I consider 2.0-2.1 to be pretty good for an auto. 5 speeds should be able to cut better 60s...1.9-2.0s |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| March 08, 2008, 12:35 AM | #5 |
J.R.
The Postmaster General
SN95Forums Sponsor
Trade Count:
( 0)
SN95 Veteran
Offline
Location: Muskegon, Mi
Posts: 12,791
Forum Meanie Head
|
Slipped the clutch at 3500, 1.89
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| March 08, 2008, 07:30 AM | #6 |
brightwhite98GT
Trade Count:
( 0)
redlining 1st
Offline
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 240
|
I just got back from the races not too long ago. It was my first time ever racing, so I have no idea if I did good or bad. But my 60' time best was a 2.17 (with street tires 245 width) and my best 1/8 mile time was 9.31. Is that good or bad?
not bad for the first time out...but the 60 could definately improve...is this a 5 speed or auto? I consider 2.0-2.1 to be pretty good for an auto. 5 speeds should be able to cut better 60s...1.9-2.0s 5 speed. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
98 Mustang GT *RIP*
94 Mustang GT - MAC H pipe, Pro 5.0 short shifter, BBK CAI, 3.73 gears, underdrive pulleys, MSD cap, MSD ignition, EGR deleted, AC deleted, BBK shortie headers
-Devin
|
|
|
| March 08, 2008, 07:43 AM | #7 |
justinschmidt1
Trade Count:
( +13)
SN95 Veteran
Offline
Posts: 5,981
|
get some better tires and im sure you will improve.
you should be able to do 1.8s to 2.0s with a decent set of drag radials
it will improve your e.t. by a lot
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| March 09, 2008, 02:04 AM | #8 |
Venom351R
Trade Count:
( +4)
SN95 Veteran
Offline
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,284
|
It all comes down to the traction of two factors. The tires you are using and the condition of the track. My track is known for not having that good of a prep so sticky tires are a must. The best I could do with Nitto's was a 2.1, no matter what I did I coud not cut a sub 2.0 with the Nitto's at this track. I switched to MT ET Streets and my first night running them I cut a 1.808 which stands as my best 60" to date. I launched I believe at 3,500-4,000 RPMS and pretty much dumped it. Cant wait to get back this year and try it some more, this was late in the season and I never got the chance to go back and improve on it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
June 11, 2007, 12:06 PM
